PDF text: eact status of the dispute between
the nailroad Executives and t be ftll.
road Labor Organizations headed by Mr.
Jewell is confused in the mind of th a
PDF text: the Railroad Company and certain of its employees
as to whether the Company should deal with a certain labor organization to which many of its employees
PDF text: until there has been a final determination that the labor
organization has the right to exclusive representation of the employees in the
unit with respect
PDF text: various States, mayors of
some of the principal cities of the United States, several
farm, agricultural, arid labor organizations, traveling salesmen
PDF text: the terms of the law
labor organizations to control transportation, even to the extent
requiring settlement of disputes by negotiation with authorized
PDF text: of its employees
as to whether the Company should deal with a certain labor organization to which many of its employees belonged, System
Federation No
PDF text: , 29 U.S.C.
s 104.
FN2. 'Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor
organization representing employees in an industry affecting
PDF text: their organization."
In the case of Coppage v. State of Kansas,4 the Supreme Court
said:
"Can
it be doubted that a labor organization, a voluntary
PDF text: Court
said:
"Can
it be doubted that a labor organization, a voluntary organization of
2 117 N. E. 582.
s 245 U. S. 229.
4 236
U. S. 100.
IOWA LAW
PDF text: . Failing of agreement a complaint was
dant refused to renew
Held, that (I) the
industry.
tiff labor organization against the defendant
as scheduled by the