/Jive Label Group
A discussion of how mobile devices (e.g. cell phones) have impacted the music industry. Topics include mobile marketing, convergence and distribution of music on mobile devices; how mobile affects musical acoustics and consumption; ringtones; the f...
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00002
PDF text: '
The Red Cross Line, petitioner, was represented by Homer
L. Loomis and Reginald B. Williams, and the Atlantic
Fruit Company,
respondent, by John V
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00004
PDF text: arhigation. the decision of which
shuld he inal. The Atlantic Frit CoipanY refusing to >uIlbllit
the qiiestioni to arbitration, the Red Cross Line sotught to
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00001
PDF text: I
108
RED CROSS LINE v. ATLANTIC FRUIT CO. 109
O(~TBERTE,,inI. 1923.
(1pmion of the Court.
Argument for Petitioner.
21; v. S.
counsel retained
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00003
PDF text: . McCaffrey, supra, 648; Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Line,
Tlhe reia-un for this link is obscuce. Tli notion
44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 274 (1024).
seems to
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00007
PDF text: controversy,
the,
Supreme Court, or a judge thereof shall designate and appoint
an arbitrator
or arbitrators
t
Matter of Red Cross Line, 233 N. Y. 373, (1922
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00006
PDF text: Red Cross. Line v. Atlantic
Fruit Co., supra, at 121, 44 Sup. Ct. at 276. Since the
enforcement of the
arbitration clause would result in an award which
RedCrossLineVAtlanticFruitCo264US_1924_File00005
PDF text: ); Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v.
Dahl. 45 S. Ct. R. 156 (192).
It has
Cf.. Red Cross Line v. Atlintic Fruit Co. 264 U. S. Too (1M24).
been contended that