This is an alert ×
How Does Science Add to Knowledge?: Popper's Criterion of Falsifiability

Protected resource

This media resource is available only to members of Institutions that have licensed it.

If you believe your Institution has licensed this video, please login to view.

To license this media resource, please have your Library contact the publisher/copyright holder cited in the metadata of this resource.

Abstract
Karl Popper maintains that the role of scientific tests is to refute or falsify theories not confirm them. So science, he says, makes fallible conjectures, the bolder the better. For Popper, science is built level by level, setting new knowledge on top of the old. The structure of science, however, is built on a bottomless swamp with long sturdy piles driven far into the earth;that's what keeps it on a fairly even keel. Criticisms of Popper's emphasis on falsification echo those posed against inductivism: "Does science really work that way?"
Series
Introduction to Phliosophy, Examined Life, The
Duration
00:04:50 (HH:MM:SS)
Language:
English
Copyright Holder
Name INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
RoleDistributor
Telephone800-576-2988 x122
Address150 E. Colorado Blvd. Ste. 300, Pasadena, CA 91105
Email[email protected]
Rights Declaration:
This video is protected by copyright. You are free to view it but not download or remix it. Please contact the depositing institution for further information about how you may use this video.
Persistent/Share URL
https://54098.surd9.group/show.php?pid=njcore:18922
Basic LTI parameter
pid=njcore:18922
PID
njcore:18922