This is an alert ×

Protected resource

This media resource is available only to members of Institutions that have licensed it.

If you believe your Institution has licensed this video, please login to view.

To license this media resource, please have your Library contact the publisher/copyright holder cited in the metadata of this resource.

Abstract
Philosopher Michael Sandel criticizes the argument that the Supreme Court should adopt a neutral position that does not prevent individuals from opting for physician-assisted suicide. Professor Sandel talks about the opposing view, which does not agree that each of us is autonomous and should have the right to decide what happens to us. According to those who favor this perspective, life is not the possession of the person who lives but, rather, a gift of which we human beings are the guardians.
Series
Introduction to Philosophy, Ethics, Examined Life, The
Duration
00:05:12 (HH:MM:SS)
Language:
English
Copyright Holder
Name INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
RoleDistributor
Telephone800-576-2988 x122
Address150 E. Colorado Blvd. Ste. 300, Pasadena, CA 91105
Email[email protected]
Rights Declaration:
This video is protected by copyright. You are free to view it but not download or remix it. Please contact the depositing institution for further information about how you may use this video.
Persistent/Share URL
https://54098.surd9.group/show.php?pid=njcore:19149
Basic LTI parameter
pid=njcore:19149
PID
njcore:19149