This is an alert ×
Legal Precedent: Federalism Decisions of Rehnquist Court, The

Protected resource

This media resource is available only to members of Institutions that have licensed it.

If you believe your Institution has licensed this video, please login to view.

To license this media resource, please have your Library contact the publisher/copyright holder cited in the metadata of this resource.

Abstract
The vast majority of cases that arise in courts involve issues of statutory and administrative law rather than constitutional law. Toward the end of the Rehnquist Court there were a series of decisions in which states were granted immunity from federal regulation in specific instances. Landmark cases such as New York v. the United States and Prince v. United States were reminders to Congress that states remain free to resist congressional policymaking under certain circumstances.
Collection
Political Science Collection
Subject
Rehnquist Court, federalism, sovereignty immunity cases, state autonomy cases, New York v. United States, Prince v. United States, hand-gun control legislation, state versus federal power, Judiciary: Applying the Law, The
Series
American History, American Government and Politics, Framework for Democracy
Contributors
James, Bernard (Performer), INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications (Firm)
Duration
00:03:08 (HH:MM:SS)
Language:
English
Copyright Holder
Name INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
RoleDistributor
Telephone800-576-2988 x122
Address150 E. Colorado Blvd. Ste. 300, Pasadena, CA 91105
Email[email protected]
Rights Declaration:
This video is protected by copyright. You are free to view it but not download or remix it. Please contact the depositing institution for further information about how you may use this video.
Persistent/Share URL
https://54098.surd9.group/show.php?pid=njcore:19362
Basic LTI parameter
pid=njcore:19362
PID
njcore:19362
Metadata
View MARC Record | View Full Record