This is an alert ×
Legal Precedent: Judicial Review

Protected resource

This media resource is available only to members of Institutions that have licensed it.

If you believe your Institution has licensed this video, please login to view.

To license this media resource, please have your Library contact the publisher/copyright holder cited in the metadata of this resource.

Abstract
The controversy over judicial power is intensified by the fact that federal judges are not elected. The balance of power among the three branches of government comes into particular focus in the exercise of judicial review. Whenever the Supreme Court strikes down democratically-enacted laws under judicial review, public scrutiny is intense.
Collection
Political Science Collection
Subject
judicial power, non-elective status, political judgments, judicial review, original Constitutional design, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall, public scrutiny, Judiciary: Applying the Law, The
Series
American History, American Government and Politics, Civics, Framework for Democracy
Contributors
Melnick, Ph.D., R. Shep (Performer), Rakove, Ph.D., Jack (Performer), Varat, Jonathan (Performer), Volokh, Eugene (Performer), INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications (Firm)
Duration
00:01:10 (HH:MM:SS)
Language:
English
Copyright Holder
Name INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
RoleDistributor
Telephone800-576-2988 x122
Address150 E. Colorado Blvd. Ste. 300, Pasadena, CA 91105
Email[email protected]
Rights Declaration:
This video is protected by copyright. You are free to view it but not download or remix it. Please contact the depositing institution for further information about how you may use this video.
Persistent/Share URL
https://54098.surd9.group/show.php?pid=njcore:19367
Basic LTI parameter
pid=njcore:19367
PID
njcore:19367
Metadata
View MARC Record | View Full Record