This is an alert ×
Thinking and Language: Case of Wrongful Termination?, A

Protected resource

This media resource is available only to members of Institutions that have licensed it.

If you believe your Institution has licensed this video, please login to view.

To license this media resource, please have your Library contact the publisher/copyright holder cited in the metadata of this resource.

Abstract
A shadow jury listens carefully to opposing attorneys characterize the events that led a quality control manager, Elena Gonzales, to file a lawsuit against her former employer. Is this a case of wrongful termination? What arguments will these mock jurors find credible? One juror's pre-established prototypes of the relationship between production and quality control influences the way he looks at the conflict. Others approach problem systematically, trying one approach after another to see what works. Still others make their decision using simple cues.
Collection
Psychology Collection
Subject
shadow jury, lawsuit, wrongful termination, judgment of probability, pre-established stereotypes, systematic analysis, simple cues, Thinking
Series
Cognitive Psychology, Introduction to Psychology, Inside Out
Contributors
Cacioppo, Ph.D., John (Performer), Kahneman, Ph.D., Daniel (Performer), Myers, Ph.D., David G. (Performer), INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications (Firm)
Duration
00:03:20 (HH:MM:SS)
Language:
English
Copyright Holder
Name INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications
RoleDistributor
Telephone800-576-2988 x122
Address150 E. Colorado Blvd. Ste. 300, Pasadena, CA 91105
Email[email protected]
Rights Declaration:
This video is protected by copyright. You are free to view it but not download or remix it. Please contact the depositing institution for further information about how you may use this video.
Persistent/Share URL
https://54098.surd9.group/show.php?pid=njcore:19640
Basic LTI parameter
pid=njcore:19640
PID
njcore:19640
Metadata
View MARC Record | View Full Record