Abstract
Academic Program Review is a cornerstone of every college’s improvement process. There are many different models and visions, and it’s often difficult to get faculty and other stakeholders on board. Key considerations include:
• What are the institutional priorities?
• How can this job be made manageable?
• Can the process be standardized institution-wide yet still leave room for individualization?
• How can the program review process be centralized and documented?
This session showcases how MCCC standardized quality and viability indicators for the Academic Program Review process, shifted the focus to student learning outcomes, and created a cloud-based repository to facilitate reporting.
• What are the institutional priorities?
• How can this job be made manageable?
• Can the process be standardized institution-wide yet still leave room for individualization?
• How can the program review process be centralized and documented?
This session showcases how MCCC standardized quality and viability indicators for the Academic Program Review process, shifted the focus to student learning outcomes, and created a cloud-based repository to facilitate reporting.
Collection
Subject
Contributors
Duration
00:49:15 (HH:MM:SS)
Language:
English
Target or Intended Audience
adult/continuing education, higher education, college, educator
Copyright Holder
| Name | NJEDge.NET |
| Role | copyright holder |
| Telephone | (973) 596-5490 |
| Address | Office: 218 Central Avenue, Suite 3902, Newark, New Jersey 07102 |
| [email protected] |
Copyright Date
2012-11-30
Rights Declaration:
This video is protected by copyright. You are free to view it but not download or remix it. Please contact the depositing institution for further information about how you may use this video.
Persistent/Share URL
https://54098.surd9.group/show.php?pid=njcore:27106
Basic LTI parameter
pid=njcore:27106
PID
njcore:27106
Metadata